[Skip back to April 2001 /
Return to Boardroom index /
Skip ahead to June 2001]
Subj: BoardRoom: Jermin rap kikt ar assis
From: ratgirlus@hotmail.com (Ratgirl)
Time: Tue, 01-May-2001 15:30:00 GMT IP: 165.97.10.201
Dear Fellow Artist et the Shamu Sho Kilim,
Mee end Vanity Fairy bof sez yu kikt al ar assis yu wuhs so gud.
I hoppe yu wil do yore rapping agin nekst time. Maybee in sum nu
langijes.
Your Fellow Artist,
Ratgirl
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Jermin rap kikt ar assis
From: shannonmccormick@hotmail.com (Shannon)
Time: Tue, 01-May-2001 18:59:36 GMT IP: 198.214.102.11
Alas, I don't know if Korey knows any other languages besides
English and German. Jeremy Lamb, however, has been known to rap
in French, so perhaps we could have a Franco-Prussian War/Battle
of Verdun/Maginot Line recreation between our Teutonic and Gallic
rappers. I'd write the frame if you guys are up for it.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Jermin rap kikt ar assis
From: ratgirlus@hotmail.com (Ratgirl)
Time: Tue, 01-May-2001 19:50:12 GMT IP: 165.97.10.201
Dear Fellow Artists et Shamu Sho,
THET WIL BEE SO CULE - YU GYS GOT TOO DOO ITT!!!
Yu kin go on ture efterwords end becom famus.
Your Fellow Artist,
Ratgirl
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Jermin rap kikt ar assis
From: mselyn@hotmail.com (Amie Elyn)
Time: Wed, 02-May-2001 07:38:16 GMT IP: 24.27.44.115
YES! Let the war commence (but not until after this week's show
so I can witness it.)
Subj: BoardRoom: War of the Rap
From: kjslair@hotmail.com (kilim)
Time: Wed, 02-May-2001 19:10:16 GMT IP: 129.116.78.131
We'll just have to see, ya'll.
Subj: BoardRoom: This Saturday
From: shannonmccormick@hotmail.com (Shannon)
Time: Thu, 03-May-2001 20:44:56 GMT IP: 198.214.102.11
Hey everybody,
Do a good show this weekend. I'll be in New Orleans for Jazzfest
(yay!) and will sadly miss the third No Shame (boo!).
But you will be in the more than capable hands of Allison
DeFrees and I hope to return from Louisiana bitterly
disappointed that I will have missed the best No Shame in Austin
to date. I know of a number of people who'll be performing this
weekend. It should be a fab show.
Drop me a line and tell me how it goes.
Shannon
Subj: BoardRoom: Hey
From: shannonmccormick@hotmail.com (Shannon)
Time: Tue, 08-May-2001 14:07:22 GMT IP: 198.214.104.105
Hey everybody,
How was the show this past Saturday? Haven't heard from anyone.
Shannon
Subj: BoardRoom: sure is quiet in here ...
From: swarson@austin.rr.com (Skipper Chong Warson)
Time: Wed, 16-May-2001 21:03:08 GMT IP: 64.217.73.146
It got as quiet as a dot-com downturn in here ...
Subj: BoardRoom: Yes it is
From: shannonmccormick@hotmail.com (Shannon)
Time: Fri, 18-May-2001 13:40:36 GMT IP: 198.214.103.189
Yeah, I don't know what's going on. Maybe having a show this
weekend will get people inspired to post long, partisan reviews
of the show. More life, I say!
Your host
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Yes it is
From: ratgirlus@hotmail.com (Ratgirl)
Time: Fri, 18-May-2001 20:30:42 GMT IP: 165.97.10.201
Dear Fellow Artists et the Shamu Sho,
Four the Shamu Sho tomaro, I is going too doo sumfing wif
gumdraps.
Whut abowt yus?
Your Fellow Artist,
Ratgirl
Subj: BoardRoom: re: War of the Rap- a Nu Chalinj frum Ra
From: ratgirlus@hotmail.com (Ratgirl)
Time: Fri, 18-May-2001 20:34:15 GMT IP: 165.97.10.201
Dear Fellow Artists et the Shamu Sho,
Is wee going too hev a wrap wor er nut?
Whut upp, mi homies? I fink yus is skird. I wil wrap in rat, iff
yus wil wrap inn the langijis uv yur natif peepuls.
Your Fellow Artist,
Ratgirl
Subj: BoardRoom: Barnes' response, Etc.
From: mselyn@hotmail.com (Amie Elyn)
Time: Sun, 20-May-2001 06:59:31 GMT IP: 24.27.44.83
Well, good thing I didn't take you up on that bet, Ratgirl,
because Michael Barnes did respond to my second email. Here is
what he wrote:
"Amie, very good points. There is a subjective element to all
this as well. Try as we might to make lofty decisions, we
critics often end up reduced saying: "I liked that!" or "I
didn't prefer that." Anyway, continue keeping us honest, Michael"
OK, a sort of honest answer. But it still doesn't make things
right in my book. Sigh.
As far as the show tonight, I have to say that I thought the
overall quality of the pieces was a little better than the last
show I attended (end of April). However, I didn't understand
the films. Especially the one with the TV. Anyone care to let
me in on the joke? Somebody sure thought it was funny.
Also, why did we have to start almost half an hour late? Is it
something I should expect for every show? If so, that's ok, I
just need to be mentally prepared next time. On a brighter
note, this show seemed to go faster than the last one I saw,
even with the late start time. Faster is good.
My favorite pieces were the dog piece (it made me cry) and the
tap dance piece. Good job, guys.
One last thing for this message post, all of you who aren't
otherwise engaged this coming Friday or Saturday, May 25th and
26th, should most definately check out HyperZoo by Ethos. It's
a performance art installation and it's one of the most
evocative things I've seen in a long time. And I'm not just
saying that because I know the people involved, because frankly,
I'm not a big fan of Ethos' work. However, I really liked this
piece. Tickets are only $7 and you can stop by any time during
zoo hours, which are from 9PM-11PM. You can stay as long as you
want and leave when you're ready. No pressure. It's like an
art exhibit. The zoo is located in an airplane hanger at the
old Meuller Airport. Getting there can be sort of confusing so
follow these directions carefully. From I35, travel SE on
Airport Blvd. for about 3/4 of a mile. Look for Patterson Park
on your right. (If you make it to 38 1/2 street, you've gone
too far.) Directly across from the park, there is a cluster of
buildings and a huge Phillips 66 sign. Turn in to the parking
lot and you're there. Hope some of you can make it.
Thanks for a fun show. I won't be able to make it to the next
No Shame because of a family reunion, but I'll definately be
back for more.
Amie
Subj: BoardRoom: ashamed to say it ...
From: swarson@austin.rr.com (skipper chong warson)
Time: Mon, 21-May-2001 21:49:26 GMT IP: 66.68.79.115
But. Wasn't able to make the show last Saturday. And I really
wanted to. Too many engagements, too little time.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Barnes' response, Etc.
From: swarson@austin.rr.com (skipper chong warson)
Time: Mon, 21-May-2001 21:50:23 GMT IP: 66.68.79.115
What was this email in reference to, Amie? I'm lost.
Subj: BoardRoom: Order for 5/19/10
From: shannonmccormick@hotmail.com (Shannon)
Time: Wed, 23-May-2001 03:18:08 GMT IP: 209.184.0.143
Order from 5/19/01
Sorry we don't have the order from the show I missed (5/5/01). I
heard it was small but that there were some lovely pieces. Lauri
Anne Poole"s (sp?) piece was especially fine from what my peeps
have reported.
Anyway, I thought this last show was pretty solid. Many video
pieces, monologues, etc. I'd still like to see more pieces
involving more than two people, but that I hope will come with
time. Consider it my challenge to you for next show.
Enough yakking, here's the order:
1. Antonio Benavides Cantu Diego Espiritu Franciso Garcia
Hernandez Ignacio Jesus Karne Lopez Martinez Nunez Ochoa Perez
Quiroz Reyes Sanchez Tito Uno Valdez Wowie Xochi Ybarra Zulu
Smeeth, by same (Gonzo Gonzalez). A short mysterious message to
all the ladies from a guy named Chili. Video piece.
2. Critical Exchange, by Amie Elyn. Amie reads from and gives
thoughts on her recent emails to American-Statesman critic
Michael Barnes on the inequities of the nominating process for
Austin theatre awards. Essay/monologue/manifesto.
3. Slaves in My Bunker (#12), by Ratgirl. Ratgirl tells us of
her living arrangements and the sorry state of her tiny guitar,
then sings a ditty about Thom the World Poet to the tune of
Yellow Rose of Texas. Comic monologue.
4. Georgie Girl, by Roy Dearen. Bubble Boy Roy's piece about his
dog Georgie. Dramatic monologue.
5. My Blues Had a Baby and They Called it Bi-Polar Disorder, by
David Trachtenberg. Blues song about the travails of bi-polar
disorder. Musical piece.
6. Summer Lovin', by Chelsea Gilman. Film starring Jeff Amos and
his cigarettes on a ferris wheel.
7. Worst Case Scenario, by Loaded Gun Theory. Perfomed by Travis
Holmes and a couple of the LGT people I don't know. Insturctions
on how to survive cougar attacks, charging bulls, and alien
invasions. Comedy sketch.
8. Gook as Sugar Toes the Chinaman, by Gook (Hung Nguyen). While
Spike Jones' song "You're a Sap Mr. Jap" plays, Hung in yellow
face does tap dance routine. Conceptual comic dance piece.
9. The People's Republic of No Shame Part 1 or Erin Brown Took
the Crown, by Shannon McCormiick (based on material provided by
Lee Eddy). Shannon reads from high school year books while
talking about colors as last names, STDs, and dance contests.
Conceptual/dramatic monologue.
10. The U.S. Mint, by Jeremy Lamb. Film starring Jeremy and
other cats from the Well Hung Jury. Jeremy struggles with props
including a beer can and a television while the TV yammers on
about the number of $5,000 bills in circulation. Conceptual film.
11. Common People, by Jarvis Cocker. Performed by Mike D'Alonzo
and Chris Alonzo. Mike introduces Jarvis Cocker (Chris) who
sings Common People while wasted, then announces he will never
play Austin again. Musical sketch.
12. The Wounded Girlfriend, by Veronica Nicks. Veronica reads
her mission statement and the text from a package of razors to
an unseen mental health professional or perhaps an ex-boyfriend.
Serio-comic monolgue.
13. Nocturne, by Jon Benner. Starring Ben Sterling and some guys
I don't know. Experimental film-noiry piece including beat-heavy
instrumental music. Film.
Subj: BoardRoom: New Deal
From: shannonmccormick@hotmail.com (Shannon)
Time: Wed, 23-May-2001 03:20:25 GMT IP: 209.184.0.143
New No Shame stuff:
Here's the new deal. I've been feeling that it's been taking me
too long to get the show started and Amie Elyn has confirmed my
suspicions. I think one of the ways that I can deal with this is
by having sign-ups start at 10:30 on Saturday nights. This will
allow for people to get to the Hideout a little bit later than
they have been and will cut down on the bored milling around
factor that I'm sure contributes to pre-show fatigue. The other
thing I'm going to do is not open the space at all until 10:50
and then I'll let everyone in, perfomers and audience alike, at
the same time. And then the show will start as close to 11 as
possible.
The other thing I would like to see happen is for someone to
volunteer to be our house manager in the same way Allison
DeFrees has been helping me do box office. This would be a
simple role, but it would alleviate the pressure on me while I
take scripts and ferry them up to the light booth, etc. If
anyone would be interested in lending a hand, please let me know.
OK, so there's the new deal.
Sign-ups at 10:30
Everyone enters the space at the same time
Looking for a helping hand in the house manager role
Thank you all. You are beautiful.
Your host,
Shannon
Subj: BoardRoom: re: New Deal
From: shannonmccormick@hotmail.com (Shannon)
Time: Wed, 23-May-2001 03:24:20 GMT IP: 209.184.0.143
Two more things:
I've seen the mock-up of the poster we're going to distribute for
June and it kicks ass. Brain Yanish is a genius. You can visit
his web site at www.brianyanish.com.
If anyone would like to post scripts to the No Shame web site for
other No Shamers to peruse, contact me or the web master whose
address in somewhere on the No Shame pages (I just can't think of
it right now).
Shannon
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Barnes' response, Etc.
From: mselyn@hotmail.com
Time: Wed, 23-May-2001 20:28:37 GMT IP: 24.27.44.83
In my piece last Saturday, I shared some of the email I have been
exchanging with Michael Barnes about the Austin Theatre Critics
Table Award nominations. The post on the message board was his
response to one of my replys.
Subj: BoardRoom: If brevity is the soul of Wit.....
From: mselyn@hotmail.com
Time: Fri, 25-May-2001 04:21:01 GMT IP: 24.27.44.83
Then why did it feel like it was 5 hours long?
I'll tell you why. "Wit" has to be one of the most boring, one
note plays I've ever seen. It would have made a much better
short story. Why does Pulizer Prize have to equal dull? Who
gives those things out? I don't know, but I can guess. Boring,
middle and upper class white people. Get with it, guys!
I have seen Spalding Gray and he talks for two hours and it's
very engaging. The main character in Wit retells the same
monologue for less than two hours and I wanna slit my wrists.
Maybe being a real person makes all the difference. Then again,
Heather Woodbury plays characters who do nothing but talk and
it's riveting. So maybe the real key is that the character or
person talking HAS TO HAVE LED AN INTERESTING LIFE SO THEY HAVE
SOMETHING INTERESTING TO SAY. The main character in Wit does
not fit that description. She doesn't even come close. I've
sat next to more entertaining characters on the bus.
In short, don't waste your time or money. RESIST THE HELL THAT
IS POPULAR AMERICAN THEATRE.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: If brevity is the soul of Wit.....
From: ratgirlus@hotmail.com
Time: Fri, 25-May-2001 16:36:30 GMT IP: 165.97.10.201
Dear Fellow Artists et the Shamu Sho,
If yu is finking of seeing Wit, I fink itt wud bee betur too go
too ve hospittle end spind 2 owers tauking too sik peepul end
thin maybee spind $30 own bying thim baluns ur beeny babees.
The big stoogie has a sik muver thet wud luv four sum uv yu too
vizit hur. She may bee dull butt et leest she's rilly sik end nut
just pretending. Lest weke she fel owt a hur moterizd cher end
hert hursef. Reel sikniss is so much mor funi, end intristing end
emoshunully muving then pretend sikniss. Plus, it dudnit cost
thirtee dolers too go si itt.
I thot the storee wuhs nut veri tru end I thot the mane ladee
wusnit veri beleevabul er likabul. Jist becuz a play is abowt
sumthing thet skares peepul, dudnit meen its gud. End whut wuz up
wif hur gitting nekid et the end? Thet wuhs kind uv a mikst
metefour, wusnit it? I mene, wuhs it supozd too bee sum kind uv
metafisicul pairadocs? Too indikate beeing free frum the bodee,
wee ekspose the bodee? Ratgirl thinks the awdiens mite bee
smarter then the peepuls hoo thot up thet crap. Maybee nut. Butt
I wuhs boored. Wuhs yu?
End wuts wif the docter bashing? Did a bunch uv loyers underrite
the sho? Iff it wuhs supozed to sho how docters is unfeling, I
got thet efter abowt 2 minits. I didnit nede itt to bee ramd doun
my throte itt four 2 mor owers. End dey made de nurs intoo a
saint. Der is mor sutiltee (uv carikter) in any givin episod uv
Bay Wach.
(I chalinj inywon too disagri wif thet last statmint. I wil bring
inn a copee uv a Bay Wach episod end wee wil wach it end thin yu
kin tel mee hoo is rite.)
End this frum uh direkter hoo jist rote a buk own direkting. Gee,
Ratgirl shur must bee et odds wif de wurld, but I wuhs mildlee
insultid end mostlee bored by hiz rathur trite direkting choysis.
Most impurtintlee, I didnit git the feling hee nu wut Def wif a
capital D is al abowt.
I welcom rebutils, butt onlee frum peepuls hoo fev SEEN or HERD
(fur the visiallee impard) the play, plees.
Thenk yu,
Your Fellow Artist,
Ratgirl
Subj: BoardRoom: Anna Bella Eema
From: shannonmccormick@hotmail.com
Time: Sat, 26-May-2001 13:36:02 GMT IP: 209.184.0.216
I haven't seen Wit, so I'm staying away from that debate. But I
just saw Anna Bella Eema at the Blue Theatre last night, and I
would say it was the most satisfying production I've seen here
in Austin. The play is good, the direction wonderful, and the
three actresses each turn in one of the strongest perfomances
I've seen. In short a true piece of theatre, and it looks like
it only cost a handful of coins to stage. And it's experiemntal
but still full of narrative.
I highly recommend this play. There are only a few shows left,
and Sunday performance is for women only. Go see it.
Shannon
Subj: BoardRoom: re: If brevity is the soul of Wit.....
From: yaskitty@hotmail.com
Time: Sun, 27-May-2001 06:05:27 GMT IP: 66.68.162.59
well...fuck... you took the words right out of my mouth. i was
really expecting a fucking wonderful show, and i got "wit"..if
you could even call it that. i knew the experience was going to
be a nightmare when the main character started speaking. there is
nothing worse to me than the "actor voice" and that is all i got
from the actress. she was so insanely disconnected from her
character. through the show i kept thinking about how she must
probably use that same voice in her stereotypical portrayals of
shakespeare... and you know something is wrong when the audience
starts thinking about the actor's private life and is not in any
way being held by the scene. it must have been before the 20
minute mark when i first had to look at my watch... i would do
the same about 5 more times.
see... i really wanted to like it... when you go to a show, you
hope that the experience will be atleast somewhat enjoyable... i
was truly bored through the entire show. the main problem for me
was (as i discussed before) the main actress. if she atleast
seemed remotely connected- i would have probably had an easier
time, but she wasn't. it did not even seem as though SHE believed
the character... and how can you expect an audience to believe
you when you don't even believe yourself. her inflictions were
odd..
the most exciting part of the show for me was seeing lameece play
one of the students/ a doctor.. she is a tremendous actress.
if i hadn't gotten into the show for free and had ended up paying
more than $5 for the ticket i would feel pretty disgruntled right
now.
so if you haven't seen it... don't... but sometimes these kinds
of plays are the most interesting. you learn from them... i
really think they help actors/actresses grow...
done,
yasmin
[Skip back to April 2001 /
Return to Boardroom index /
Skip ahead to June 2001]