[Skip back to July 2001 /
Return to Boardroom index /
Skip ahead to September 2001]
Subj: BoardRoom: remember them cameras?
From: strangelove45@hotmail.com (aPAULling cRUST)
Time: Thu, 02-Aug-2001 06:06:43 GMT IP: 208.50.104.90
in the earlier part of the spring season, there was a no shame
in maibe theatre, which was videotaped. the cameras were kind of
high tech and were being well monitored by a couple of people.
halfway thru the show, they switched sides to get a different
angle. does anyone remember this? more importantly, does anybody
know what this was for?
i know this is kinda late to be inquiring about this, but i
always figured it'd be brought up and explained by somebody
else. it never was (to my knowledge). today, i remembered it
all, so i thought i'd leave a post on the board to find out.
so yeah, anybody know?
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Sound + Fury
From: edmundscott@earthlink.net (edmundscott)
Time: Thu, 02-Aug-2001 16:57:05 GMT IP: 63.50.21.59
Nick,
Sorry, Sir, but you're dead wrong. You need to read it again. The
exterior story (i.e. what happens, Cliff Notes style) of The Sound
and the Fury is, I grant you, not much, but it couldn't be too much
more involved without sacrificing the real story, the interiority;
plot shouldn't be your reason for reading in the first place. What
great narrative authors have done from Melville to Conrad to
Faulkner to McCarthy to Morrison to Gass is to model our world/life
by isolating certain aspects of concern within a smaller
(fictional) world so as to highlight them, (the Pequod in Moby Dick
thus becomes, simultaneously, the mind, America, all of humanity,
etc.). This is basic to most fiction, from good to bad--Faulkner
to Grisham--what separates the great from the herd is the breadth
of experience a great author manages to contain within his/her
model. Why does Shakespeare have such repute? One reason might be
that his plays model the world with greater detail and variety
than, say, Fletcher, or Arthur Miller (not my favorite playwright).
Faulkner details Yoknapatawpha County not only on a narrative axis
but on psychological, sociological, sexual, racial, political,
economoic axes etc. as well. TSatF, Light in August, As I Lay
Dying, Absalom, Absalom! as well as parts of The Hamlet -&- If I
Forget Thee, Jerusalem, are about as concentrated as twentieth
century consciousness gets; their models, in their richness, sing
to the receptive reader of a unity in real life.
Nick, it's not that hard, he does play fair, and you do need to
read it again, because I'm slavering to argue with you on this
theme in person, and at great length too and with daemonic
persistence, the minute I finish persuading Arlen that Shakespeare
is a great writer too (sigh).
Subj: BoardRoom: In my opinion.
From: jlerwin@weallscreamforhotmail.com (Seamus MacErwin)
Time: Thu, 02-Aug-2001 20:31:23 GMT IP: 207.191.211.207
In Dan's opinion, everybody should read "The Sound and the Fury."
In my opinion, there should be a word in between 'making out'
and 'fucking', so that the same term doesn't cover quick kisses
and mutual frig sessions, and when a friend of mine says, "
______ and I made out," then I can know "This is harmless"
or "You're going to ruin your damn life." Nowadays, "making out"
is an even more useless air-wasting goddamn phrase than the
lamentably destroyed "What's up?".
In my opinion, there ought to be a painful rite of passage from
adolescence to adulthood in American culture. Nothing is sadder
than a fat bald American driving a red Ferrari while popping
blood pressure meds.
In my opinion, that idiot in Italy who wants to make human
clones should be forced to bear all the clones himself until he
truly understands the pain of dozens of miscarriages,
stillbirths, and infant deaths necessary to produce one sickly,
malformed child who spends his entire short life under a media
spotlight, dying before he truly understands why those nearby
shun and fear him as a monster.
In my opinion, it's a sad copout to say these things here while
I wear a tie and carry a briefcase and angle for power within
the Democratic Party. I angle for power there by saying the
things that everyone already agrees with at the exact time where
I will look the most like someone exasperated by all the
bullshit and argument. Hey, it took me a year to go from guy off
the street to State Committeeperson and County Financial Chair.
James is crabby today.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Sound + Fury
From: shannonmccormick@hotmail.com (Shando Calrissian)
Time: Fri, 03-Aug-2001 16:43:29 GMT IP: 198.214.102.190
Always good to listen to your brain in words, J.C.
You should all check out the Austin No Shame. The show is coming
along quite well.
Shannon McCormick
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Sound + Fury
From: danpbrooks@hotmail.com (Dan Uncle Maury Br)
Time: Fri, 03-Aug-2001 19:07:05 GMT IP: 209.212.82.162
Aw, heck, man. I agree with your opinion, but I disagree fairly
wholeheartedly with your argument. Maybe it's a little snippy to
cut and paste, but I'm just going to do it this one time:
JC (it is you, right, JC?) says:
"What great narrative authors have done from Melville to Conrad
to Faulkner to McCarthy to Morrison to Gass is to model our
world/life by isolating certain aspects of concern within a
smaller (fictional) world so as to highlight them, (the Pequod in
Moby Dick thus becomes, simultaneously, the mind, America, all of
humanity, etc.)"
And JC is smart as fuck, so I listened to him. But this time, I
take issue. I would argue that the above statement is true only
wit the revision "what _academic critics of_ great narrative
authors..." I don't think Faulkner deliberately made his
Yoknapatawpha County a model of anything but _maybe_ a larger,
similarly troubled southern United States in the first draft. I'm
willing to concede that he _might_ have finished the first draft,
analyzed it himself and seen the allegory embedded therein, and
then went on to accentuate that allegory (those allegories) in
subsequent rewrites. But I think the bulk of what JC discusses --
with respect to Faulkner and Moby Dick and whatnot -- is a
product of academic analysis, and not deliberate invention on the
part of the authors. It's akin to the process of psychoanalysis;
the doctor realizes that the patient is reenacting his stunted
relationship with his parents in liason after unsuccessful
romantic liason, but all the patient knows is that he keeps
dumping his girlfriends after three months. In the same way,
Faulkner's subconcious anxieties/convictions about the South come
out in The Sound and the Fury, but when he wrote it I suspect
that he was just thinking about screwing with narrative,
reinventing traditional sentence structure, ripping off The
Catcher in the Rye (a book that would be written twenty years
later, clever devil) for Quentin's Harvard scenes, etc.
(This is getting long.) Why do I say this? Because I write a lot,
and I used to do so in a university setting, where I got heavy
theory and analysis both before and I after I wrote stuff. Have
you ever tried to write a scene by sitting down beforehand,
deciding who the two (say) characters are, what they want in the
scene, and why they can't both get it? The resultant piece
of "writing" sucks ass -- or at least it always does when I try
to do it that way. Structural, character, formal and allegorical
analysis comes after the first draft is written, at the very
earliest. Otherwise, your theory trips you up somewhere along the
line, and you stop having fun, and you pay attention to what
you're saying and not what you're writing, and all of a sudden
you're Bertolt Brecht. If you're lucky.
Now, is Faulkner's prose masturbatory? I don't think so, because
I happen to like it and ergo I think it works. Joyce, on the
other hand, is a wanker. This is a purely arbitrary aesthetic
decision on my part, but I stand by it. (Also, I get the feeling
that Faulkner loves his characters -- even the jerks. I feel the
same way about Barthelme, whom Mose got me to read a few months
ago. Joyce, on the other hand, seems to be stricken not with
hatred for the world -- which I can get into, passion, you know --
but rather just distaste. That turns me the hell off real fast.
Plus, he's writing essentially about himself in Portrait of the
Artist, which I always hate in a bildungsroman.)
Coming full-circle, then, I would argue that Shakespeare is
better than Arthur Miller for reasons pretty much the opposite of
why JC likes him better. I think when you read a Miller play --
particularly Death of a Salesman, which is arguably his Big One --
you know exactly what he's writing About. He's writing About
alienation and depression and the essential futility of modern
life (let's say. Everybody thinks he's writing about something
different, but they always think he's writing about a particular
thing, which is my point.) You can picture old Archie at his
typewriter, realizing how he's writing About these things and
thinking about it the whole time, and thus making his play a
little more simplistic and a little less rich and real as a
result. But Shakespeare, with a few notable exceptions, is a lot
harder to ascribe motivations to. Who knows what the fuck A
Midsummer Night's Dream is About? This is how you know it's good
I think. (On second thought, maybe this is exactly JC's argument -
- the complete model of a world theory. Still stands that Miller
can bite me.) Shakespeare is good because he writes great scenes
and interesting characters and far-out ideas that seem perfectly
legitimate and uncontrived when he executes them. The other
stuff -- the symbolism, the larger meaning -- is for the
spectators in the writing game. We should worry about how he's
doing things, not the larger What he's doing.
Morrison? Tell me you don't mean Tony Morrison in the same
sentence as those other folks.
Dan
Subj: BoardRoom: 1 part Sound, 2 parts Fury
From: jlerwin@wanketywankwank.com (Jimmy)
Time: Fri, 03-Aug-2001 20:05:14 GMT IP: 216.243.220.117
Dan:
I agree with your statement about Joyce only this far. You can't
see how far I'm gesturing, and that's probably a good thing for
our friendship. Joyce is not full of distaste for the world!
Reread Ulysses, and you will discover what I discovered when I
was 16 (footnote: as a result, I was not discovering girls at
that time, which probably would have been much healthier for me)-
namely, that the average person has no greater advocate and
passionate student than James Joyce. Ulysses is a paean of
triumph and a revelation of the heroism and beauty in the most
meaningless and trivial of gestures or lives. The closest I have
come to heaven on this, God's Earth, is with Joyce on my lap
beneath a stately oak. (Get your mind out of the gutter.)
James
-ostpay iptscray: And I find Faulkner is vastly improved if you
imagine you're overhearing him muttering drunkenly to himself in
some dingy bar.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Sound + Fury
From: edmundscott@earthlink.net (edmundscott)
Time: Fri, 03-Aug-2001 21:18:15 GMT IP: 63.50.21.2
Dan-
I think you misunderstood me or, more likely, I was writing so fast
I didn't express myself very well; anyway, you and I are in
complete agreement about everything. I did NOT and do NOT mean
that any author worth anything is sifting for theme ahead of the
writing; by "model" I just mean that all narrative worlds must,
necessarily, exclude 99% of the world, or else exceed, length-wise,
transencyclopedic tedium. So that the world of any book must be a
mini-me to the doctor evil that is life. Anyway, by model I didn't
mean allegory (yawn) though I can see how I seemed to imply that.
The point is, that in writers like Bill Shakes or Bill Faulks, the
whole world comes at the reader instead of some single lousy notion
(all notions, all beliefs, all ideas, all opinions, this one
included, being lousy and the lousier when alone). Your
distinction of Miller writing ABOUT things vs. Shakespeare's just
gobbling up what fits inside his lips is a better way of stating
what I meant.
Yes I meant Toni Morrison. She's uneven as all get out (can't
stand Jazz, for instance), but have you read Sula? Wow. However,
we're one-for-one, I suspect, as I can't stand J.D. Salinger. Glad
you are one of the three in the country besides myself who read and
appreciate William Gass. I'm not so hard on Joyce: genius, yeah,
but he does get on my nerves, does wear out his welcome fast, and I
have no pressing desire to spend three months rereading Finnegan's
Wake anytime soon. I don't think you can dismiss him, though;
Faulkner acknowledged him as a master.
Subj: BoardRoom: snow shite
From: mdrothschild@aol.com (rothschildy martin)
Time: Fri, 03-Aug-2001 22:23:03 GMT IP: 152.163.201.48
Barthelme? I have to vote yuck on Barthelme. I read his version
of Snow White in the terrible lit class I took last summer, and
I hated it. I just wasn't drawn in at all by it. Perhaps that's
the idea of "pomo" fiction, but I don't think it matters if the
readers simply doesn't like the story, and I didn't. Of course,
I hated that class in general and spent most of that summer
drunk, so that might have something to do with it.
Anybody wanna move to LA with me?
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Sound + Fury
From: shannonmccormick@hotmail.com (Shannon)
Time: Fri, 03-Aug-2001 22:26:23 GMT IP: 209.184.1.45
So we can surmise that the three people in the U.S. who have read
Gass besides J.C. are me, Dan Brooks, and William Gass.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: snow shite
From: shannonmccormick@hotmail.com (Shannon)
Time: Fri, 03-Aug-2001 22:28:43 GMT IP: 209.184.1.45
Skip Barthelme's novels. He's much better in 3 page doses. I
recommend both 60 and 40 Stories. 60 is slightly better, although
it doesn't contain "The Palace at 4 A.M." nor "At the Tolstoy
Museum."
That is all.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: snow shite
From: kalelerwin@hotmail.com (Erwin)
Time: Sat, 04-Aug-2001 00:38:41 GMT IP: 207.191.211.207
Oh, and once you've read Barthelme you can skip Mark Leyner, who
is basically a shallower yuppie version of Barthelme. And once
you've read my pieces in the archives, you can stop attending
theater altogether, because that's just all there is anymore.
Except for Dan. And once you've kissed a lady of Paris, you
realize you've never been kissed at all.
Subj: BoardRoom: skdfsafdl
From: laskdfj@asfjkh.shf (lskadjf)
Time: Sat, 04-Aug-2001 06:01:54 GMT IP: 24.6.203.142
Subj: BoardRoom: re: skdfsafdl
From: ghrkdgi@mnladsd.fdo (ghrfkdgi)
Time: Sat, 04-Aug-2001 21:50:11 GMT IP: 205.244.160.123
ljtynmk thzknk trprt? nr asflkda ghrfds fqqprbb? nhjtkhvl
ntoxxlkdfs bvyttdw nvtrwq william gass!!!
-rtyfsdls
Subj: BoardRoom: re: skdfsafdl
From: mdrothschild@aol.com (roths)
Time: Sun, 05-Aug-2001 23:35:14 GMT IP: 64.12.106.21
ljtynmk thzknk trprt? nr asflkda ghrfds fqqprbb? nhjtkhvl
ntoxxlkdfs bvyttdw nvtrwq william gass!!!
-rtyfsdls
Man, who let the Klingons leave a message?
Subj: BoardRoom: re: skdfsafdl
From: roths@pee.onmee (shtor)
Time: Mon, 06-Aug-2001 16:40:32 GMT IP: 205.244.161.234
:Man, who let the Klingons leave a message?
Your racial bigotry is not appreciated here, Michael.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: skdfsafdl
From: whiteguy@basket.ball (pookie)
Time: Tue, 07-Aug-2001 01:18:23 GMT IP: 205.244.161.64
::Man, who let the Klingons leave a message?
:Your racial bigotry is not appreciated here, Michael.
Speak for yourselfers. I am one pleased for a change to see
some No Shame board racial bigotry .
Subj: BoardRoom: re: skdfsafdl
From: erwin@yermascombatboots.com (ATCGGATTTCAG)
Time: Tue, 07-Aug-2001 17:26:57 GMT IP: 216.243.220.117
Hey, I'll have you know that Chris Okiishi and I consistently
disparaged the writing of the white people at No Shame. And the
Klingons, for that matter.
"kHe TAch! mAs chu HOCH lib!"
"HCH! !chU oo! ARKH ARKH ARKH ARKH!"
The trope is a sine qua non of hackneyed predictability, the pace
is forced, delivery stilted, and worst of all, the author coerces
us into enjoying this along with him by writing in a pause for
laughter and by firing a disruptor at random into the audience.
Subj: BoardRoom: re: skdfsafdl
From: massy@yahoo.momma (massssyrupques)
Time: Wed, 08-Aug-2001 20:00:46 GMT IP: 128.255.111.184
My teacher tells me that blue-eyed people are slower, stupider and
smellier than brown-eyed people. Also, blue-eyed people caused the
deaths of six million brown eyed people.
Leave the klingons alone.
Fight the real enemy.
Sinead O'Connor.
Subj: BoardRoom: Fruit Juice
From: lucre@farts.com (Inky)
Time: Sun, 12-Aug-2001 05:22:43 GMT IP: 205.244.161.249
So here I am thinking, geez, I feel groggy and gross. I
remember seeing a fruit juice machine accross the street.
That would hit the spot. So I grab $1.25 in change and head
over there, only to find that the machine is out of everything
but orange strawberry banana, which sounds good, but
costs $1.75. So I head back to my place, grab a dollar bill
and make my way back to the machine. I buy the stuff and
out comes a bottle of startlingly transluscent fluid. Hmm,
thinks I, even when very settled, the juices of oranges,
bananas and strawberries ought to look pulpier than this. I
shake the bottle with a ridiculous amount of force, but the
opacity doesn't change. I try it and it tastes awful, then I read
the ingredients and find it's mostly water and high fructose
corn syrup. I just paid $1.75 for corn syrup. I had to whine to
somebody.
Subj: BoardRoom: Arlen Lawson Theif
From: cmstangl@dead.com (Stang L)
Time: Sun, 12-Aug-2001 16:26:54 GMT IP: 24.4.252.103
Arlen Lawson's idea for a band "The Dickens" which he has been
trying to crank-start since I met him is already the name of a
country-rock band with record contracts and discs-on-shelves.
The real Dickens is worse than Arlen-playing-guitar-in-my-living-
room-Dickens, though. Kudros to Arlen Dickens.
I don't post because I don't have an Internet in my house. My
mom does though.
Rev. Chris Stangl @ mom's house dot com
Subj: BoardRoom: Improv Troupe
From: joshcrawford@hotmail.com (Josh Crawford)
Time: Thu, 16-Aug-2001 01:35:02 GMT IP: 216.248.127.175
I'm a recent graduate of Player's Workshop of the Second City in
Chicago and am looking for an improv troupe to hook up with in
the Iowa City area. Any ideas or suggestions or offers? Have
been trained in all forms of improv, individual, long-form,
short-form, musical, serious... Contact me if you have any
information or interest. Thanks- Josh Crawford
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Christ Stangl Thief and Kettle!
From: danpbrooks@hotmail.com (Dank Brooks)
Time: Sat, 18-Aug-2001 00:57:04 GMT IP: 209.212.82.162
Reverend Chris Stangl? I'll have you know that there's this chick
on the Lower East Side who does specious performance "art" and
calls herself Reverend Jen. She wears elf ears everywhere -- even
when she's just walking around, and not doing masturbatory solo
stuff on stage -- and she has this lisp that makes me want to
build a time machine and leave her infant body in a dumpster even
more. Also, she did this thing at PS 122 called Avant-Garde-
Arama, in which we showcase "new and emerging" (read: not very
good) artists, and she didn't show up for her tech rehearsal,
and when she performed it turned out to be a half-improvised
teletubbies pardoy anyway, and for God's sakes the teletubbies
aren't even an overdone cliche anymore, they're just forgotten,
and I don't even bother to capitalize them even, and yesterday
was my birthday so today being Friday my boss filled me full of
whiskey and there's this married girl here at work who's real
cute and maybe she's going to leave her husband and she keeps
flirting with me, not just talking but really _flirting_, in the
weight-shiftingest, used-to-be-a-modern-dancerest sort of way,
and what is Reverend Jen mildly famous for on the Lower East Side
besides being mildly famous, because Christ, I think she just
bought her whole ouevre at the Halloween store. I still
capitalize Halloween, because it has some relevance to our modern
lives. No apostrophe, though, on account of anachronistic.
Hi guys. My play is doing good out here. Well! Well! Please sign
me to your literary agency.
Dan
Subj: BoardRoom: Tuesday
From: mrauthorboy@hotmail.com (T Kovacs)
Time: Sun, 19-Aug-2001 06:31:46 GMT IP: 65.100.180.24
Hey guys, I finally regained access to a computer. The Rockies
won by a landslide today, which doesn't happen much because
they're last in the division. Other than that, the Denver scene
is the same as it always is. But if any of you are in town, some
friends and I should be doing a little show at Stella's coffEE
House Tuesday night. We'll be performing under the name of
Chasing Santa (like Chasing Amy but a little more mythological).
By the way, does anyone know when No Shame is starting up again?
Subj: BoardRoom: re: Christ Stangl Thief and Kettle!
From: mdrothschild@aol.com (rothy)
Time: Mon, 20-Aug-2001 05:02:17 GMT IP: 205.188.193.33
Last night I somehow became filled with cider and vodka, walked
out into a driving rainstorm and waited for God to take me. He
didn't.
Have you met with any agents yet? They are a sneaky bunch, aren't
they. Much like the woman you speak of.
Subj: BoardRoom: Sep 7 (--&-- Aug 31)
From: neilerdude@hotmail.com (Balls)
Time: Mon, 20-Aug-2001 21:03:08 GMT IP: 205.244.162.211
Here it is, the official announcement: No Shame will make its
return on Friday, September 7th, at 11:00pm in Theatre B. As
usual, pieces will be taken in the lounge beginning at 10:30.
Also, No Shame is taking part in the Weeks of Welcome festival
this year, and on Friday, August 31st, at 9:30pm, there will be
a free outdoor mini-No Shame. The show will take place in
Blackhawk Square on the Ped Mall (next to The Den), and will
last 30-45 minutes. Unlike a true No Shame, however, the
writers for this show have all been predetermined. So, unless
you've been asked to do so, don't show up with a piece and try
to get into the show! Sorry.
Any questions? See you soon.
Balls
Subj: BoardRoom: re: (----&---- Aug 31)
From: aaronrgalbraith@hotmail.com (Some dumb lady)
Time: Wed, 22-Aug-2001 05:46:39 GMT IP: 205.188.199.23
Have you guys ever seen real live amateur improv theatre? Well
then you are all in for a big damn treat! The University of
Iowa's Weeks of Welcome staff proudly presents the No Shame
Theatre Amateur Improv Ensemble Troupe Posse!!! NSTAIETP No
Shame is even rawer and more unpredictablerer than regular No
Shame! So bring your witless suggestions to yell from the crowd
and prepare to split your sides, because we're live, poorly lit,
and using stand up microphones!!
Subj: BoardRoom: re: (------&------ Aug 31)
From: gullible@gullible.gullible (gullible)
Time: Thu, 23-Aug-2001 12:43:19 GMT IP: 128.255.202.213
this is a joke, i assume?
Subj: BoardRoom: re: (--------&-------- Aug 31)
From: charky@hotmail.mom (charky)
Time: Thu, 23-Aug-2001 15:33:59 GMT IP: 128.255.107.165
Never assume. When you do, you make an ass out of u and me. On the
same token, never joke. When you do, you make a j out of o and ke.
charky
Subj: BoardRoom: re: (------&------ Aug 31)
From: neilerdude@hotmail.com (Balls)
Time: Thu, 23-Aug-2001 17:09:15 GMT IP: 205.244.162.42
"Some Dumb Lady" (who has a suspiciously familiar email address)
is parodying the posters all over downtown advertising the WOW!
edition of No Shame, because on those posters No Shame is
described as being "amateur improv performances." Rest assured,
that will not be the case. But seeing as how nothing sounds
funnier or more interesting than amateur improv, we're expecting
a huge turnout. Better watch your back, IC Improv!
Thought the live, poorly lit, stand up microphones part is all
pretty accurate.
Balls
Subj: BoardRoom: re: (----------&---------- Aug 31)
From: cabin@boy.com (chris elliot)
Time: Thu, 23-Aug-2001 22:33:16 GMT IP: 128.255.199.216
is this the famous half man/half shark "charky" from "cabin boy?"
Subj: BoardRoom: re: (--------&-------- Aug 31)
From: mdrothschild@aol.com (rothy)
Time: Fri, 24-Aug-2001 18:24:11 GMT IP: 64.12.105.59
"But seeing as how nothing sounds funnier or more interesting
than amateur improv..."
I must disagree, and add that amateur improv is basically the
worst thing that's ever happened to theatre, besides magical
realism.
I got a job today!
Subj: BoardRoom: re: (----------&---------- Aug 31)
From: foop@foop.foop (foop)
Time: Fri, 24-Aug-2001 22:51:20 GMT IP: 24.6.203.142
I think that you are not disagreeing with anybody, Roth. I am
pretty sure it was sarcasm. I think magical realism can be
wonderful.
Subj: BoardRoom: Sept 31st question
From: shanghai@noon.com (fried ice cream)
Time: Mon, 27-Aug-2001 06:13:04 GMT IP: 128.255.202.213
So, the No Shame show on the 31st is at 9:30, right?
Is it on the same stage as the KRUI bands? If so, I thought
those bands get over at 8. So, what's in between the bands and
No Shame. It'd be cool if No Shame could get all those left-over
indie rock kids as audience members... since they'd be into what
No Shame does (i.e. No Shame is Indie Rock Theatre).
Subj: BoardRoom: re: (------------&------------ Aug 31)
From: cooldaddy@dadula.com (count crapula)
Time: Mon, 27-Aug-2001 15:58:36 GMT IP: 128.255.109.175
You're right, Foop. Magical realism can be wonderful. I think what
Roth was trying to say was that amateur improv is the worst thing
that's happened to theatre, besides Firebugs.
Subj: BoardRoom: Captain Cereal!!!!
From: bromarks@aol.com (john the handsome)
Time: Mon, 27-Aug-2001 16:03:56 GMT IP: 128.255.109.175
So two of my room/mates have a morning show on KRUI, that's 89
with a 7 at the end of it on your favorite radio dial. The name
of their radio show, which plays 7am on Monday mornings is "The
Continuing Adventures of Captain Cereal and his Breakfast
Brigade." Seeing as how this title is a lot to remember, they
needed a catchy theme song to go along with the show. That's
where Nozebone stepped in. We wrote a catchy theme song for "The
Continuing Adventures of Captain Cereal and his Breakfast
Brigade," which can be heard on 89.7 KRUI at 7am Monday mornings,
if you are so inclined to listen, you incliner you. Oh, the name
of our catchy theme song? "The Continuing Adventures of Captain
Cereal and his Breakfast Brigade."
Markus Markus Ted -&- Alice
Subj: BoardRoom: re: (--------------&-------------- Aug 31)
From: mdrothschild@aol.com (rothschild)
Time: Tue, 28-Aug-2001 06:50:29 GMT IP: 205.188.193.168
You're right, Foop. Magical realism can be wonderful. I think
what Roth was trying to say was that amateur improv is the worst
thing that's happened to theatre, besides Firebugs.
Uh oh. Flamed by someone who won't even leave their name. Pardon
me while I vomit in fear.
Firebugs wasn't the worst thing that's happened to theatre. It
was just a show that didn't turn out so good. Sort of like
Mallrats.
Subj: BoardRoom: misprint/Friday
From: adam@avalon.net (Adam Burton)
Time: Tue, 28-Aug-2001 12:18:09 GMT IP: 24.4.166.160
In the Daily Iowan's University Edition section, page 59, "high
and dry" article, they state that No Shame takes place on Fridays
at 10pm. If someone were to call they could request that the DI
print a correction which includes the correct time AND informs
people that it doesn't start till next week. Just a thought..
That way you'd be spreading correct information while getting
even more free press.
-Adam
Subj: BoardRoom: necessary roughness
From: strangelove45@hotmail.com (paulrust)
Time: Fri, 31-Aug-2001 07:27:04 GMT IP: 128.255.202.213
hello - to anyone who is interested, i've got a new web page. if
you wanna' smell it, go to "who's who at no shame" on the main
page and click on my name. it'll take you right there! that's
technology for you.
or you can just go to "www.angelfire.com/ia2/paulrust" and see
it that way.
i plan on doing semi-regular updates (knock on wood-like
material), so it maybe something you want to keep checking on in
the future.
p.s. i hope ms. clarke doesn't mind that i used her dad's photo
on my page. if it's a problem, i'll find a way to kill myself.
[Skip back to July 2001 /
Return to Boardroom index /
Skip ahead to September 2001]